Heroes

A friend of mine recently observed that in America, politicians are supposed to be “ordinary folks,” while ordinary people are supposed to be heroes.  It is a shrewd observation and one that has some disturbing consequences – it enables people like Sarah Palin to be taken seriously (I don’t know about you, but I want elite, not so ordinary people making important decisions for me).  And I have noticed a trend that our society feels compelled to celebrate a person’s “heroism” whenever something bad happens to them – a celebration that often replaces the far nobler responses of reflection* and empathy.

On the other hand, it is a wonderful and uniquely American experience to watch so many otherwise ordinary people striving for heroism.  And so often succeeding – if, as the wise man said, just for one day.

*And prayer, for those so inclined.

This one goes out to all the heroes in my life (several of whom read this, apparently):

Share

Posted in Random, The Dailies | 4 Comments

The Daily …

Since he says he doesn’t mind, the praying for Christopher Hitchens edition.

Quote:

“The four most over-rated things in life are champagne, lobster, anal sex and picnics.”

- Christopher Hitchens

Verse:

“Peace I leave with you; my peace I give you. I do not give to you as the world gives. Do not let your heart be troubled and do not be afraid.”

- John 14:27

Song:

“Champagne Supernova” – Oasis.

May God bless you and keep you today.

Share

Posted in The Dailies | Leave a comment

You’ve been very naughty

This isn’t long enough for a full post, but one of the more interesting additions to the Baptist Faith and Message after the fundamentalist takeoever of the Southern Baptist Convention was the following (adopted in 1998):

Parents are to teach their children spiritual and moral values and to lead them, through consistent lifestyle example and loving discipline, to make choices based on biblical truth [emphasis mine].

Notice again, the subtle replacement of the traditional Baptist hermeneutic with the vague appeal to “biblical truth,” substituting rote obedience to one’s pastor for a prayerful, personal walk with Christ.

But I’m getting ahead of myself.  So, what is this “loving discipline” the SBC speaks of?  Well, the verse they cite in support is Proverbs 13:24: “He that spareth his rod hateth his son: but he that loveth him chasteneth him betimes.”

Now, the faithful, contextually aware reader will immediately recognize the reference to the shepherd’s staff and the shepherd/flock imagery that abounds throughout the Bible.

Another might see the analogue between this parent’s rod and the heavenly father’s rod of judgment (Cf. Psalm 2:9, Revelation 2:27, etc.).

The “literal” Southern Baptist reader, of course, reads this and naturally decides that the passage means he is required to beat his children with sticks.  Out of Christian love.

I could quote verse after verse, and write out an entire journal article, or three, on how this interpretation is not consistent with the witness of Christ (the standard by which the SBC used to interpret scripture).

But, as any good author knows, showing is usually more effective than telling.  So, for all my evangelical friends who believe they are biblically obligated to spank their children, please do the following:

Google* the term “spanking.”  Take a look around at the results (both websites and images).  Now answer me one simple question: Is this a good, healthy, biblical, Christian way to discipline** your kids?

Clearly, it isn’t.  Or, as I like to say to parents who ask my advice, “of course I believe in spanking – just not children.”

That tends to get the point across.

*First make sure that “safe search” is turned off.  You’ll want a full and accurate idea of what you’re dealing with here.

**Not only is spanking an inappropriate form of childhood discipline, the American Academy of Pediatrics has found it to be woefully ineffective.

Share

Posted in Hermeneutics, Rants | 2 Comments

Further hiatus

Stuff came up and my hiatus must be continued until Friday.

In the meantime, I know a lot of you are worried about where the appeals process goes from here.  So, confidential to all my Lambda Legal friends:

May God bless you and keep you.

Share

Posted in Random | 2 Comments

On hiatus.

There are a couple big posts coming up (one of which will actually be interesting – I promise), but I will not be able to write much until Wednesday, because I’m helping my best friend move and she doesn’t (yet) have internet. Updating your blog by iphone is an adventure :)

Anyway, thank you all very much for reading. I didn’t even know people read this, but apparently I have readers as far afield as Colorado (hi Richard!).

In the meantime, I’ll leave you with some love from New Jersey:

“Thunder Road” – Bruce Springsteen.

Share

Posted in The Dailies | Leave a comment

The Daily …

The whimsical escapist edition.

Quote:

“It is only with the heart that one can see rightly; what is essential is invisible to the eye.”

- Antoine de Saint Exupéry

Verse:

“Now we see but a poor reflection as in a mirror; then we shall see face to face. Now I know in part; then I shall know fully, even as I am fully known.”

- I Corinthians 13:12

Song:

“Dreams” – The Cranberries.

May God bless you and keep you today.

Share

Posted in The Dailies | Leave a comment

Confidential to my friends in the academy:

I realize that the approaches of postmodernism (understood broadly) are relevant to a lot of discussions.  I also realize that to discuss any topic in depth, you need a sufficiently complex intellectual framework, and thus “jargon.”

However, when writing in the popular press (or your blog, or worse yet on your Facebook status / Twitter*), the second you use words like “hegemony” and “reification,” a large portion of your readership stops paying attention.  And if you’re any kind of activist (as people who talk about “value-latent cisgender class privilege” tend to be), you’re going to get written off by the exact people you’re trying to reach.

I will also note that the worst abusers are not professors, but first and second year grad students.  Guys, writing stuff like “interrogating the heteropatriarchal hegemonic performativity” in your status updates does not make you look smart, or worldly.  It merely ensures that all the non-academics will think you’re pretentious.  And with the academics, this is the best-case scenario.  Use a phrase like that incorrectly, and we’ll think you’re slow and pretentious.

I know you’re excited to be in grad school – there are all these wonderful new words and ideas floating around.  Explore them, have fun with them, sprinkle them liberally in your term papers and let them tag along to your conference presentations.  But please keep them off my Facebook feed.

Plain language is your friend.

*I’m not linking to individual instances so as not to offend the authors, but y’all know who you are.

Share

Posted in Rants | 1 Comment